<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Dandy Candy – White Chocolate Bark with Ginger and Pistachios</title>
	<atom:link href="http://leslieland.com/2009/01/dandy-candy-%e2%80%93-white-chocolate-bark-with-ginger-and-pistachios/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://leslieland.com/2009/01/dandy-candy-%e2%80%93-white-chocolate-bark-with-ginger-and-pistachios/</link>
	<description>in Kitchen and Garden and all around the House</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 12:19:31 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: leslie</title>
		<link>http://leslieland.com/2009/01/dandy-candy-%e2%80%93-white-chocolate-bark-with-ginger-and-pistachios/comment-page-1/#comment-1293</link>
		<dc:creator>leslie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2009 13:36:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://leslieland.com/?p=1988#comment-1293</guid>
		<description>Hi Harsh

Thanks for writing. You are right that the Federal Standard of Identity for &quot;chocolate&quot; includes chocolate liquor, and this regulation brought no end of grief to producers who wanted to distinguish items based on cocoa butter from less costly - and less tasty - substitutes.

In the late 90&#039;s ( I think it was), they began to petition the FDA for a rule change and as far as I can tell from a quick read they got a Federal Standard for &quot;white chocolate&quot; in 2002.  Details are at http://www.cfsan.fda.gov/~lrd/fr021004.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Harsh</p>
<p>Thanks for writing. You are right that the Federal Standard of Identity for &#8220;chocolate&#8221; includes chocolate liquor, and this regulation brought no end of grief to producers who wanted to distinguish items based on cocoa butter from less costly &#8211; and less tasty &#8211; substitutes.</p>
<p>In the late 90&#8217;s ( I think it was), they began to petition the FDA for a rule change and as far as I can tell from a quick read they got a Federal Standard for &#8220;white chocolate&#8221; in 2002.  Details are at <a href="http://www.cfsan.fda.gov/~lrd/fr021004.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.cfsan.fda.gov/~lrd/fr021004.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Harsh Ranjan</title>
		<link>http://leslieland.com/2009/01/dandy-candy-%e2%80%93-white-chocolate-bark-with-ginger-and-pistachios/comment-page-1/#comment-1292</link>
		<dc:creator>Harsh Ranjan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2009 05:30:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://leslieland.com/?p=1988#comment-1292</guid>
		<description>White chocolate originates from the cocoa (cacao) plant, but it is not &#039;chocolate.&#039;  According to the FDA, to be called &#039;chocolate&#039; a product must contain

chocolate liquor, which is what gives it the biter intense chocolate flavor (and color) to dark and milk chocolates.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>White chocolate originates from the cocoa (cacao) plant, but it is not &#8216;chocolate.&#8217;  According to the FDA, to be called &#8216;chocolate&#8217; a product must contain</p>
<p>chocolate liquor, which is what gives it the biter intense chocolate flavor (and color) to dark and milk chocolates.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
