<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Washing Spinach</title>
	<atom:link href="http://leslieland.com/blog/washing-spinach/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://leslieland.com/blog/washing-spinach/</link>
	<description>Cooking â€¢ Gardening â€¢ Home Style</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 03:54:54 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: leslie</title>
		<link>http://leslieland.com/blog/washing-spinach/#comment-10189</link>
		<dc:creator>leslie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Sep 2007 19:12:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://leslieland.com/blog/?p=142#comment-10189</guid>
		<description>Thanks for your comment, Sara

with the basic impulse of which I am in complete agreement.

That said, we all live in different parts of planet earth and not all resources can be accessed from everywhere. Where water comes from river diversions,  wells sunk into deep aquifers and other sources whose tapping has multiple ramifications, mindfulness of conservation definitely rates a "should." Where it comes from self-renewing, single access sources like  dug wells  and surface-captured  springs -  AND  is returned to the earth though well-designed septic and grey water systems - the only  thing you're conserving by using less is the power it took to pump it.  That too is usually in the "should" column, of course, but when it comes to power consumption,  this blog tries to offer options and let participants choose for themselves. ( I usually hang my laundry on the line, but don't try to part me from my processor)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for your comment, Sara</p>
<p>with the basic impulse of which I am in complete agreement.</p>
<p>That said, we all live in different parts of planet earth and not all resources can be accessed from everywhere. Where water comes from river diversions,  wells sunk into deep aquifers and other sources whose tapping has multiple ramifications, mindfulness of conservation definitely rates a &#8220;should.&#8221; Where it comes from self-renewing, single access sources like  dug wells  and surface-captured  springs -  AND  is returned to the earth though well-designed septic and grey water systems - the only  thing you&#8217;re conserving by using less is the power it took to pump it.  That too is usually in the &#8220;should&#8221; column, of course, but when it comes to power consumption,  this blog tries to offer options and let participants choose for themselves. ( I usually hang my laundry on the line, but don&#8217;t try to part me from my processor)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sara</title>
		<link>http://leslieland.com/blog/washing-spinach/#comment-10188</link>
		<dc:creator>Sara</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Sep 2007 18:37:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://leslieland.com/blog/?p=142#comment-10188</guid>
		<description>"If you live where water should be conserved, Just use two big bowls........" I'm quoting from September 22nd 2006, tips about washing spinach.
And I ask :don't we all live on planet earth where water should be conserved?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;If you live where water should be conserved, Just use two big bowls&#8230;&#8230;..&#8221; I&#8217;m quoting from September 22nd 2006, tips about washing spinach.<br />
And I ask :don&#8217;t we all live on planet earth where water should be conserved?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
